top of page
J-20 has a delta wing with leading root extensions and a trailing edge with a sweept back angle, however it can be considered a trapezoidal wing.


Let us see


Delta  wings • Advantages: • Delta  wings  have  a  long  root  chord  and  therefore  can  have  a  thick   main  spar  while  retaining  a  low  thickness-­‐to-­‐chord  ratio. • They  also  have  larger  wing  area  than  trapezoidal  wings  with  the  same   aspect  ratio.  This  means  low  wing  loading  even  during  maneuvers. • There  is  a  lot  internal  volume  for  fuel  and  landing  gear. • At  low  speed  conditions  they  can  produce  a  lot  of  additional  lift  when   placed  at  high  angle  of  attack,  thanks  to  the  leading  edge  vortices. • Delta  wing  aircraft  do  not  require  a  horizontal  tail. • Disadvantages: • Higher  viscous  drag  due  to  the  large  wing  area. • High  induced  drag  at  subsonic  conditions  due  to  low  aspect  ratio. • Bad  deep  stall. • Pitch  control  is  achieved  by  deflecting  upwards  the  trailing  edge   control  surfaces  in  order  to  produce  a  nose  up  moment.  This  reduces   the  total  amount  of  lift  generated  by  the  wing. • This  problem  can  be  overcome  by  incorporating  a  horizontal  tail  or  lifting   canards.


• The  pitch  control  and  bad  deep  stall  disadvantages  of  Delta  wings   led  to  several  variations: • Compound  Delta  or  Ogive  Delta:  the  inboard  sweep  is  generally  higher   so  as  to  create  even  stronger  leading  edge  vortices  and  delay  stall  to   even  higher  angles.   • Exception:  Saab  37  Viggen. • The  Ogive  Delta  also  reduces  supersonic  drag. • Horizontal  tail:  Provides  additionally  stability  in  pitch  and  therefore  the   wing  can  produce  more  lift.  Tail  elevator  provides  pitch  control • Canards:  They  are  usually  all-­‐moveable  and  provide  additional  pitch   control.  The  aircraft  is  usually  statically  unstable. • Note  also  that  flaps  are  difficult  to  use  with  a  tailless  Delta   configuration. • Delta  wings  are  generally  cropped.  The  pointy  wingtip  is  difficult   to  manufacture  and  structurally  weak.  Furthermore,  cropped   Delta  wings  delay  vortex  bursting. • The  centre of  lift  lies  aft  on  a  Delta  wing.  This  means  that  the   horizontal  tail  can  only  be  effective  if  it  lies  even  further  aft.   Usually  the  tail  is  highly  swept  and  can  be  placed  on  a  highly   swept  fin.


Trapezoidal  wings • In  trapezoidal  wings,  the  leading  edge  sweeps  back  but  the   trailing  edge  sweeps  forward.   • Some  Delta  wings  also  feature  a  slight  sweep  forward  angle  at  the   trailing  edge. • Advantages • Better  performance  than  Delta  wings  at  transonic  speeds  and  during   transition  to  and  from  supersonic  conditions. • They  do  not  require  upwards  deflection  of  the  trailing  edge  control   surfaces  for  pitch  control  and  therefore  do  not  lose  lift. • Their  centre of  lift  lies  further  forward  and  therefore  the  tail  must  not   lie  too  far  back  on  the  fuselage. • They  are  preferred  for  stealth  applications. • Flaps  can  be  easily  used. • Disadvantages: • High  wing  loading. • They  stall  at  much  lower  angles  of  attack  than  Delta  wings. • This  problem  is  overcome  using  Leading  Edge  (Root)  eXtensions (LEX  or  LERX)   and/or  canards


• Trapezoidal  wings  are  mostly  used  by  the  US. • They  are  nearly  always  combined  with  a   conventional  horizontal  tail  and  single  or  twin  fin. • They  are  nearly  always  combined  with  LEX. • Some  trapezoidal  wings  look  like  highly  cropped   Delta  wings  (F-­‐16  for  example). • Modern  trapezoidal  wings  have  very  highly  swept   leading  edges,  approaching  the  sweep  of  Delta   wings.


 


source  http://www.ltas-cm3.ulg.ac.be/AERO0023-1/ConceptionAeroFighter.pdf

The YF-23 has trapezoidal wings as they  stall  at  much  lower  angles  of  attack  than  Delta  wings, this  problem  is  overcome  using  Leading  Edge  (Root)  eXtensions (LEX  or  LERX)   and/or  canards, thus YF-23 has very long and sharp LERX.   The Trapezoidal wings have the centre of  lift  lies  further  forward  and  therefore  the  tail  must  not   lie  too  far  back  on  the  fuselage.  They  are  preferred  for  stealth  applications, all these features are seen on YF-23.
amazing_0.jpg

Compared to YF-23, J-20 has a delta wing with a trailing edge swept back, we can say it has a trapezoidal wing that is closer to a delta wing.  J-20 has the following features:

J-20 has canards, they  are all-­‐moveable  and  provide  additional  pitch   control.  The  aircraft  is very likely statically  unstable.  Delta  wings  are  generally  cropped.  The  pointy  wingtip  is  difficult   to  manufacture  and  structurally  weak.  Furthermore,  cropped   Delta  wings  delay  vortex  bursting. J-20 has cropped wings. The  centre of  lift  lies  aft  on  a  Delta  wing compared to a trapezoidal wing

1625267037899.png
The Blackbirds not only incorporated cutting-edge materials, but also some novel design concepts (Fig. 14). The Lockheed team developed a monocoque structure for the fuselage and nacelles, and a multispar/multirib wing structure with chordwise corrugations for stiffness and to prevent warping at high temperatures. This resulted in a failsafe redundant structure. The presence of fuselage side-fairings, or chines, generated nearly 20 percent of the aircraft’s total lift. Acting as fixed canards they produced a favorable effect on trim drag and minimized the aft shift of the aerodynamic center of pressure as the aircraft’s speed increased from subsonic to supersonic. Additionally, vortices from the chines improved directional stability of the aircraft as angle of attack increased. The chines also provided a convenient housing for wires and plumbing on either side of the cylindrical center-body fuel tanks.

https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/20090007797/downloads/20090007797.pdf



J-20 has very small wing LEX to be able to generate as much lift as the LEX on YF-23 or SR-71, in fact relying more on the canards to do that function
unnamed.jpg
Tricycle gear airplanes are built in the 'Delta' configuration, with the airplane's center of gravity slightly forward of the main gear.

https://www.boldmethod.com/learn-to-fly/aerodynamics/tricycle-gear-aircraft-instability/

We can see J-20 has its main landing gear far forward  from the main wing, forcing the canards and forward fuselage to generate proportionally more lift than other modern delta canard fighters and compromising more its reduced static stability more.

For a conventional, statically stable supersonic fighter aircraft, the centre of gravity is located in front of the neutral point of the aircraft during subsonic cruise. This requires a negative balancing lift force on the horizontal stabilizer. During supersonic cruise, the neutral point of the aircraft moves further aft which increases the longitudinal stability of the aircraft. This results in an increase in trim drag, due to the larger balancing negative lift force required on the horizontal stabilizer. For an aircraft which possesses relaxed static stability, the centre of gravity is located behind the neutral point during subsonic cruise. This results in a negative Stability Margin (SM) and represents an unstable subsonic flight condition. During the supersonic cruise phase the neutral point of the aircraft moves aft to a point at which it is located just behind the centre of gravity, requiring only a small negative balancing lift force on the horizontal stabilizer. This significantly increases the supersonic manoeuvrability and decreases the supersonic trim drag.


Two-surface aircraft are defined as an aircraft with two lifting surfaces. The possible two-surface aircraft configurations are the conventional and canard aircraft. The canard has a stabilizing surface, called a canard, in front of the wing instead of a horizontal stabilizer behind the wing. There can be design requirements why an aircraft engineer might opt for a canard configuration over a conventional configuration. One advantage of a canard aircraft is, that the aircraft can be trimmed, where both lifting surfaces provide a lift force in the positive direction. In contrast to a conventional aircraft, where the horizontal stabilizer will provide a relatively small down force in order to balance the nose down pitching moment of the wing-fuselage combination.

https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.860.9448&rep=rep1&type=pdf


High levels of instability enable excellent maneuverability properties for fighter aircraft. For instance the X-36 tailless demonstrator 10 or the Grumman X-29 forward-swept wing experimental aircraft (see figure 1(a)), are both designed with negative static stability margins (35%l for the X-29 11 ); as a result any perturbation from an initial longitudinal equilibrium makes the aircraft dynamically depart. If this motion is adequately controlled, superior longitudinal maneuverability is obtained. .

https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Illustration-on-unstable-aircraft-configuration-for-different-design-purposes_fig1_279836474


Tail surfaces, for example, add weight and aerodynamic drag, and having the aircraft CG forward of the wing's center of lift as required for positive natural, i.e., unaugmented, stability in pitch, requires a download on the tail for equilibrium. 

one of the advantages of Reduced Static Stability (RSS) in pitch that was exploited in the basic design of the F-16 Falcon jet fighter. By integrating so-called RSS into the basic aircraft design, equilibrium of pitching increments was achieved with the horizontal tail generating lift rather than download, so that the lift that the wing must produce to carry the weight of the aircraft is reduced. This means a smaller wing with less structural weight and drag can be incorporated into the overall design. 

https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/earth-and-planetary-sciences/aircraft-performance

 
bottom of page